‘David says it with flowers, and the guru understands.’
A journalist and his cameraman are sent on assignment to Amsterdam after the mysterious death of a diamond magnate. When they attempt to investigate, the photographer inadvertently takes a picture of a man being murdered…
Comedy spoof that is usually also tagged with the Giallo label. Popular Italian double act Franco Franchi and Ciccio Ingrassia star for Osvaldo Civirani, who directs from his own script.
Times are tough for investigative reporter Ciccio (Ingrassia), whose partner Franco (Franchi) has been forced to take photographic jobs in advertising to help their business make ends meet. They get a break when the representative of a popular magazine hires them to go to Amsterdam and look into the mysterious death of a wealthy diamond merchant. They befriend businessman Big Bon (Luigi Bonos) on the flight there, but he is arrested by the police when they touch down.

Using the contact information provided by Bonos, the duo touches base with statuesque model Thea (Elisabeth Sennfors), who gives them a bed for the night in the flat she shares with a friend. The following day they set out with their only clue; a strange phrase written on a note found in the dead man’s possession. This message refers to a man named David and a guru, the latter reference prompting a visit to the local hippie community.
Comedians Franco and Ciccio were a national institution in their homeland of Italy, but their broad band of half-hearted slapstick failed to find much favour abroad. Some of their prodigious output did make it to English-speaking shores, but this effort seems to have stalled on mainland Europe. As a result, it never had an English language title, but the original translates as at the head of this review. It’s this ‘cash-in’ title that seems to have fostered a belief that the film is a spoof of Dario Argento’s prominent Giallo ‘The Cat o’ Nine Tails/Il gatto a nove code’ (1971). It’s not. Just what it is supposed to be, well, that’s open to question.

Where to begin? The film fails on so many levels that it’s hard to know. Franco and Ciccio’s comedy stylings were never subtle and are almost the definition of an acquired taste. Franco played the ‘funny one’, pulling silly faces, chattering like Jerry Lewis on acid, and falling over things. Ciccio mainly functioned as the ‘straight man’, getting annoyed with his partner and moving things on to the next gag. Although their act was hardly original, it could work in a limited way, especially if they had something specific to spoof, such as with their Spaghetti Western ‘Fistful of Knuckles/Per un pugno nell’occhio’ (1965). Here, writer-director Civirani hands them a whole lot of nothing.
The film has many problems, but the fundamental obstacle is the script. There doesn’t seem to be one. There is no actual plot as such, just a few scattered, barely connected scenes intercut with our heroes wandering around the streets of Amsterdam, seemingly looking for something to do. The whole production possesses a hopelessly cheap and aimless quality, and it’s tempting to believe that the stars, director and a tiny crew spent a few days in Amsterdam improvising some bits and pieces. There are five minutes in a Judo School where Franco pulls faces when he’s thrown to the mat a few times, and Ciccio struggles with the weights. The sequence has no foreshadowing and never pays off in any way. The overriding impression is that the production came across the establishment in their wanderings, had a word with the owners and then just shot something made up on the spot. In a similar vein, Franco muggs his way through a song about Sicilian hippies in a darkened nightclub, but, of course, it’s entirely disconnected from everything else. Afterwards, they presumably headed back home, shot the few studio scenes on a handful of small, underdressed sets and tried to create some kind of a story. It’s not that nothing makes sense; it’s that there’s nothing to make sense of in the first place.

There also seems to have been a fair bit of guerrilla filmmaking going on. At one point, our hapless heroes stop passers-by on the street to ask them questions. One man objects to Ciccio getting too close to his child, and the actor apologises and moves on. They also mix with some hippies sitting in a city square. It’s plain that these people were not actors, and some probably were not even aware they were being filmed.
There are a few scenes where the boys interact with other legitimate cast members, although there are barely half a dozen significant speaking roles. Sennfors, who has no other screen credits, disappears from the film after a while (she probably had something better to do), and the two girls the boys chat up outside Bonos’ office also vanish immediately afterwards. Floating around on the margins of all this nothing is ubiquitous Italian character actor Luciano Pigozzi, billed as ‘Killer’, but the ‘Italian Peter Lorre’ gets less than a dozen lines.

The film’s most significant set piece is when the boys escape from a gang of faceless goons holding them captive in a windmill. The chase is speeded up as if everyone is auditioning for the Keystone Kops, and it’s accompanied by manic squeaking on the soundtrack. Our heroes don army fatigues and camouflage gear when attempting to break into a luxury hotel in broad daylight. I guess those are the comedy highlights. If you’re wondering what all this has to do with ‘The Cat o’ Nine Tails/Il gatto a nove code’ (1971) and the Giallo horror thriller in general, then keep on wondering.
If you did want to make a case for this as a Giallo, then a mystery character who appears briefly to bop people on the head with a hammer from time to time. Local Commissario (Luca Sportelli) also explains the ‘mystery’ at the end with a hefty and complicated exposition dump. Of course, almost everything he talks about happened offscreen. If the film is spoofing anything, then I guess it could be a Euro-crime thriller. That does feel appropriate as director Civirani had also been in Amsterdam the year before, shooting a real film. That project was ‘The Devil has Seven Faces/Il diavolo a sette facce’ (1971) which has a far stronger claim as a Giallo but also possesses significant elements of a more standard crime picture.

Franco and Ciccio began working together in the late 1950s, initially appearing as a duo in supporting roles in such films as ‘Maciste in the Valley of Woe/Maciste contro Ercole nella valle dei guai’ (1961). Starring vehicles followed quickly, beginning with the Foreign Legion comedy ‘I due della legione’ (1962). Over the next decade, they appeared in approximately 112 films enjoying phenomenal domestic success. There were theatre appearances, hit records and even a comic book series. However, by 1972, the ride was almost over, and they went their separate ways soon afterwards.
I don’t care if this film is a Giallo or not. Let us never speak of it again.